Posts tagged as:

The Biggest Loser

This post is inspired by the latest promotional ads for the 2012 Biggest Loser which are trying to sell you, me and the world the concept that for any person to be deserving of love – ‘ready for love’ – they must lose weight and be thin.  They’re wrong.  You can love yourself and be loved at any size.  Any.

 Image: The Examiner

Listen Up Beautiful You 

I’ve got something to say.

It’s important and I need you to read it, hear it and let it morph into your soul.  Really, really, morph.

You are beautiful and divine just as you are.

You do not need to take up less space in this world.  Your fat, curvaceous, tall, big, broad, voluptuous, curvy, adipose, magnificent self can take up all the space you deem you so require.

What shape or size you are has nothing to do with how lovable you are.

To be ready for any form of love you want or need you do not need to diet or whittle yourself away.

The love you are and the love you are attracting or not attracting in your life is not related to your shape or size.  It’s all what’s happening in the space between your ears.  Truth.  Own it and work on it if you need to.  Do it for you.  Beautiful You.

Don’t let anyone or anything attempt to convince you that you will never meet the man or woman of your dreams unless you meet a strict media driven requirement of being thin, perky, shiny and thin.

Get ready to move on if you think for one moment that there are not people out there having mind blowing, outrageously good and hot physical intimacy and sex.  They are.  They really, really are.

Untangle yourself from any notion, noggin, thought or entire belief system that the reason you aren’t lovable or beautiful or attractive or sexy or desirable is because of your shape or size.  I don’t need to see you to know this.

Move on gorgeous one.  Move on from any thought or any belief that you have to be smaller, thinner, less than you are right now to feel and know and have the love you deserve.  Give that love to yourself and watch others illuminate from your example.

Give that love to yourself and see a world of love open up to you.

{ 14 comments }

I’m wondering when the day will come when we stop jumping on the latest diet or ‘food elimination’ band wagon?  I’m genuinely wondering.  History tells us that diet and weight loss companies, being the money making machines they are, will continue to try and get us to change what we eat for no other reason than to line their pockets.  Are they in this to help people improve their general health and wellbeing? 

They say they are but really, unless they are actually telling people NOT to diet and find ways to incorporate a healthy balance of all foods into our lives, they’re selling a complete lie.  And a lie that doesn’t work by the way, which of course we all realistically know.  Why?  Because diets don’t work – the hard core research tells us so over and over and over again.  But, we keep falling for it and the case in point at the moment is sugar.  Everywhere I turn celebrities, Mum’s groups and trainers are talking about the ‘evils’ of sugar.  It’s bad.  It’s making us fat.  It’s poison. 

But how is this different to any other fad diet or push that we have seen in the past and now know with absolute certainty was a total crock.  Remember when eggs were bad?  Don’t eat them.  No good for your heart.  Filled with cholestorol.  Or how about bananas?  Hideous food.  Too energy dense and should be avoided.  Around the same time as the banana ban of course, bread and potatoes were thrown out the window.  Don’t even think about eating carbohydrates like that.  Avocadoes?  Once upon a time considered WAY too high in fat to eat.  Don’t put them in your salad or on your toast.  Fat. Fat. Fat.  Bad.  Bad.  Bad.

What do we now know about all these foods, some of which are entirely whole and natural?  Eggs are now loved by dieticians, we have learned that wholegrain rich breads are actually good for our health, bananas are filled with all sorts of goodness, and avocadoes, well avocadoes are now a Superfood.  We were all fed a steady stream of these sorts of diets and entire food or even food group elimination are the current strong push with sugar at the moment being the big bad demon.  Put down that jelly snake!  It’s sugar!

Well I thought I would turn to an expert to get the real low down on sugar and via my way to her we even have Dr Cindy Pan saying – “Consuming large amounts of pure sugar is not consistent with a healthy, balanced and nutritious diet. However, including small amounts of sugar is fine in moderation…A balanced approach that allows for variety is much more beneficial, as well as being far more palatable, enjoyable and less socially restrictive than an “everything-free” diet which, ironically, may result in you having a sense of no freedom at all.”

I contacted the wonderful accredited practicing dietician and nutrionist and eating disorder expert Jo Gibson from Eat Love Live for her thoughts on sugar.  In asking Jo if the banning or drastic reduction of sugar is really any different from previous fads we have seen she had this to say: “Sugar is a naturally occurring carbohydrate in foods which is important to provide us as energy.  Avoiding all sugar may lead to short term weight loss as it limits the amount of food to choose from…(but) it often means that foods from important food groups such as fruit, which is made of sugar and high levels of  water, are being eliminated leading to inadequate nutrient intake.  Cutting out all sugar would mean cutting out all fruits and vegetables, limiting our intake of vitamins, mineral and fibre.”

So there you have it.  Cutting out sugar from our diet involves dramatically reducing our intake of not only fruit, but even some vegetables in which sugar naturally occurs.  How can this be good for us?  Put simply, it’s not, but this is literally where the ‘elimination’ of sugar has progressed for many.  It’s not just seen to be good enough to give up lollies or chocolate, ALL sugars are being pushed as unacceptable and in need of curbing from our diet. 

A case in point is one of The Biggest Loser trainers, Tiffani Hall,who I recently heard interviewed on radio saying she did not eat oranges because of their sugar content.  That, to my mind, for a food that is natural, delicious and packed full of vitamins and fibre is utterly ridiculous and a sign that this latest dietary fad is just that – a fad – deserving to be binned along with every other diet that tries to tell us we must restrict what we eat. 

Thoughts Beautiful You?  Have you been hearing all the recent hype about sugar?  How do you manage to balance sugar intake into your everyday diet?

{ 14 comments }

I have been waiting for this article to be written for a very long time.

Since four years ago when the reality tv show The Biggest Loser started screening in Australia, I have had serious concerns and issues about the treatment of contestants on the show.  Many times I was loathe to watch it, but felt I needed to so I was aware of what was going on.  Some of the more distressing and concerning things I have seen happen on the show include -

A male contestant engaging in a secret binge eating episode while sobbing uncontrollably, only later to be chastised by his trainer for not being self controlled.  The fact it was clear this person was suffering from a mental illness and the binge was clearly driven by psychological and emotional distress was completely ignored.
A team of contestants competing in a week long challenge where they were given $50 to purchase all their food for the week.  To say they were eating miniscule amounts of food (while doing up to 6 hours of exercise a day) is an understatement.
A female contestant, clearly distressed and having breathing difficulties, being screamed at by an army soldier while she was face down in a puddle of mud.  Seems the fact she had been exercisely strenuously for a long period of time was not acceptable to him and humiliating her was in order.
I am not at all surprised that medical professionals are now expressing doubt about the program’s regimen of severe caloric restriction and up to six hours a day of strenuous exercise.  Every single doctor, dietitian and even personal trainer I have spoken to about the show has had concerns about the severity of the diet the contestants are placed on and the level of daily exercise they do.  One day I will do a Beautiful You interview with one or more of them as I think what they have to say on this issue presents a new side to the argument that everything that is done for the contestants is for the betterment of their health.

The now admitted behaviour of former contestants seems to support Dr Burants concerns.  In pursuit of the prize money contestants have deliberatly dehydrated themselves and when not being filmed exercised in heavy clothing.  Trainer Jillian Michaels from the US based series has stated this is “just part of the nature of reality TV.”  Really Jillian?  Where is your or the executives of the program duty of care to these contestants to protect or stop them from doing such dangerous things?

The answer to that appears to be I’m afraid – nowhere – when contestants are asked to sign a waiver that states:

“no warranty, representation or guarantee has been made as to the qualifications or credentials of the medical professionals who examine me or perform any procedures on me in connection with my participation in the series, or their ability to diagnose medical conditions that may affect my fitness to participate in the series.”

WHAT?  There is no guarantee given that the health of Biggest Loser contestants is monitored by a qualified medical professional?  How can the television network and producers be getting away with asking people, many of whom have serious health problems, to sign something like this?  It horrifies me to think these people are out there doing extreme things to their bodies, without even the guaranteed safety net of the credentials of people there to ‘help’ them in a time of need.  Even this I will admit has shocked me.  At the very least I thought that some very well paid medical professionals would be right at hand when needed.  If indeed they are – why the need for this clause?

A reunion show of 40 past US Biggest Loser contestants is due to screen in the coming days.  The original winner of the program is already known to not be attending due to the fact he has put back on all the weight he lost on the program.  My heart goes out to him as I suspect the prize money is no real consolation to him now.  A follow up post may be due.

What are your thoughts on The Biggest Loser?  It is a very popular program and well watched.  Are you a fan or have you, like me, always had concerns?  How do you feel about the underside of the program now being exposed?

{ 7 comments }